Ge a wr
sar RL AW
= :
DEPARTMENT GF bre HAS
: DRO CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
sol §. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1008
G
C
a
=
rt
a]
nr
JSR
Docket No. NR?
1a OT)
1
11-14
— OO
a
ra
eae
(0
ac SPAT
1
From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
To: Secretary of the Navy
Sul] , re
REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD
Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. 1552
Encl DD Form 149 dtd 10 Jan 14 w/attachments
)
\ HOMC JPL2 memo dtd 4 Sep 14.
} HOMC MIQ memo dtd 26 Sep 14
) Subject’s naval record
1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject,
hereinafter referred to 4s Petitioner, filed epclosure (1) with
this Boaré requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval
record be corrected by removing the service record page ll
(“Administrative Remarks (1070}") entry dated 26 March 2014
lcopy at Tab A).
z= a.
-'s allegations of error and
and pursuant to its regulati '
determined that the corrective action indicated below should be
taken on the available evidence of record. Documentary material
considered by the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval
records, and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record
pertaining to Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice,
Finds as follows: -
a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all
administrative remedies available under existing law and
regulations within the Department of the Navy.
b. In correspondence attached as enclosures (2) and (3),
_ the Headquarters Marine Corps offices with cognizance over the
subject matter of Petitioner’s case have commented to the effect
that the request has merit and warrants favorable action.
CONCLUSION:
‘Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record,
and especially in light of the contents of enclosures (2) and
(3), the Board finds the existence of an error and injustice
warranting the following corrective action:
2
-RECOMMENDATTION :
a. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected by removing
the service record page 11 (*Administrative Remarks {1070)")
entry dated 26 March 2014. This is to be accomplished by
physically removing the page 11 on which the entry appears, or
completely obliterating the entry so it cannot be read, rather
than merely lining through it.
b. That any material or entries inconsistent with or
relating to the Board's recommendation be corrected, removed or
completely expunged from Petitioner's record and that no such
entries or material be added to the record in the future.
c. That any material directed to be removed from
Petitioner's naval record be returned to the Board, together
with a copy of this Report of Proceedings, for retention in a
confidential file maintained for such purpose, with no cross
reference being made a part of Petitioner's naval record.
4, Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the
Board for Correction of Navai Records (32 Code of Federal
Regulations, Section 723.6(c}) it is certified that a quorum was
present at the Board's review and deliberations, and that the
foregoing is a true and complete record of the Board's
proceedings in the above entitled matter.
AVI NS J, tly ntl~
JONATHAN S. RUSKIN
Recorder
S,. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section
6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of
Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(e))
and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby
announced that the foregoing corrective action, taken under the
authority of reference (a), has been approved by the Board on
behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.
—
ROBERT J. O'NEILL
Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR3524 13
The Board, consisting of Messrs. Hicks, Spooner and Swarens, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 21 August 2014, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. g. In enclosure (8), MIQ commented to the effect that in light of enclosure (7), the contested BCP assignment and page 11 entries should be removed. of enclosures (5) and (8), the Board finds the existence of an error...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR3743-13
Finally, by implication, he also requested removing the page 11 entry dated 3 August 2011. The Board, consisting of Ms. Lapinski and Messrs. Gorenflo and Hicks, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 13 March 2014, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11(b) (“Administrative Remarks...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3747 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070)") entry dated 10 May 2011 (copy at Tab A}. The Board, consisting of Ms. Trucco and Messrs. Chapman and Exnicios, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 16 October 2014, and pursuant to its...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR8961 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070)”) entries dated 11 March 2009 and 11 August 2011. CONCLUSION: Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of enclosures (2) and (3), the Board finds the existence of an error and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5272 14
The Board, consisting of Messrs. Hicks, Spooner and Swarens, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 20 November 2014, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. e. In enclosure (6), MIQ again commented to the effect that the contested entry dated 6 January 2012 should stand, but further commented to the effect that Petitioner’s request to remove the entries dated 14 December...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2815 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval recora be corrected by removing the fitness report for 25 February to 4 July 2011 (copy at Tab A} and the service record page 11b (“Administrative Remarks (1070)") entry dated 26 May 2011 {copy at Tab B). The Board, consisting of Messrs. George, Hicks and Swarens, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 06664-11
The Board, consisting of Ms. Aldrich and Messrs. Pfeiffer and Spain, reviewed Pétitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 8 September 2011, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the limited corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070)") entry dated 26 October 2010. That any material or entries inconsistent with...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8518-13
2, The Board, consisting of Messrs. Boyd, Chapman and Spain, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 20 Maxch 2014, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. c. That any material or entries inconsistent with or relating to the Board's recommendation be corrected, removed or completely expunged from Petitioner's record and that no such entries or material be added to the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR0593 13
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the fitness report for 1 to 29% April 2011 (copy at Tab A), removing the service record page 1i (*Administrative Remarks (1070)") entries dated 1 December 2010 and 10 May 2011 (copies at Tab 3) and changing his reenlistment code from RE-3C (Commandant of the Marine Corps...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4745 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 7O! c. Enclosure (2), the report of the HOMC PERB in Petitioner's case, shows that the PERB directed removing the contested fitness report for 1 January to 27 April 2008, but commented to the effect that the five remaining reports at issue should stand. In enclosure (5), Petitioner provided new evidence in support of his new request to remove the page 11 entries dated 11 June 2010 and 12 May 2011. g. In enclosures (6) and (7),...